Thursday, October 22, 2009
Fresh on top of a project we’re currently working on - to make devoted fans of casual customers - comes a real life and quite delicious demonstration.
After an evening at Miami Ad School, I met up with star Miami alum Bobby Appleby for a bite. (BTW, Bobby is fresh out of Fallon, and one of the best hires I ever made. He’s damn good. Hire that man!)
We went to Black Sheep Pizza on Washington. My first time. Great coal oven-fired pizzas, short and sharp beer list, sassy service.
At the end of the meal, our waitress brought over the bill, and with a flourish and a grin, she announced that it was the restaurant’s first anniversary, so the pizza was on them.
Maybe it was the amount of beer I’d consumed, but I was suddenly madly in love with the place.
They had kept their anniversary a secret all evening. There was no sidewalk sign hawking celebratory deals. They apparently hadn’t even announced it in advance to regular customers. It was just a gift they loved presenting to whoever was lucky enough to be there that night. And who knows what effect it had on the wait staff - and consequently the atmosphere - knowing that at the end of every meal, they were going to get to be Santa.
How cool is that?
Advertising a special night would have no doubt crammed the room full of bargain seekers. (They were packed anyway, late on a Tuesday.) It would have been a hectic and perhaps not very comfortable customer experience. They’d have given away tons of free pizza. And everyone would have gotten exactly what they were expecting - freebies.
Instead, they made it a surprise. A secret shared between me and them. They won a fan. All through timing.
So, if you’re considering using offers to entice new customers, cool. But see if you can keep a little something in reserve, and drop it on your new customers when they least expect it.
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
These are the two conditions under which I will buy your product. Either:
I notice it,
I need it,
I can afford it,
I like how it looks/feels/smells/sounds/tastes,
I like how it makes me look/feel/smell/sound/taste,
I haven’t been disappointed by it in the past.
I like the people who made it better than I like the people who made some competing product.
I just feel like it.
Image by jeezny
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
In 1966, Hertz ran one of the toughest counter punches in advertising history.
For a few years, they’d watched Avis claim ‘we’re number two, so we try harder.’
Hertz eventually decided enough is enough. Or maybe it was that they finally figured out how to respond. The gist was this:
“For years, Avis has been telling you we’re number one. Here’s why we’re number one.”
The ads went on to absolutely steamroller the Avis argument. Hertz is number one because Hertz has more cars to choose from, at more locations, with a better service guarantee, etc etc.
Avis stuck with their message, but it never again had that same valiant tang to it.
So to Big Dumb Agencies. That’s what little companies like ours are supposed to call the big guys. But we don’t.
Not because we don’t think there’s room for improvement, there and everywhere else. Everyone agrees on that.
It’s just that to call time on the most successful machines in the industry is to misunderstand what they do for a living.
Here’s a quote from Ad Age, regarding the rumored split between Chrysler and their agency. Chrysler is “cutting back on the broad scope of services BBDO provides, including dealer training, call centers, point-of-sale materials and database management.”
Dealer training and call center management. Let’s call an all-agency meeting in the kitchen and get right on that, yeah?
The fact is, big agencies are big for a reason. Because big is the right answer for a lot of marketers. Someone has to do all that heavy lifting.
Now, is big the only answer? Can big and small co-habit? Those are different questions. First things first… let’s understand and appreciate why the big agencies are the way they are.
Image by ethomsen
Did you see this banner on adweek.com recently?
It leads to this somewhat overwrought expansion on the argument.
There are theories as to why Kleenex is spending good money on such an arcane message - essentially, creating a platform from which to launch any future trademark protection cases.
It set off a few other thoughts, though.
The people at Kimberly Clark are right - there’s a generic quality to tissue. Tissue is tissue is tissue. They want you to know that only Kleenex is Kleenex. (Sorry, only Kleenex Brand Tissue is Kleenex Brand Tissue.)
But, wait, we work hard to win our clients’ a place in culture. That’s supposed to be valhalla.
And here is a company wanting their name to be withdrawn from the conversation.
Is there another way at this for Kleenex?
Instead of lobbing the same old ’softness’ message at your customers. Why not involve the customers in this language debate? They care enough about the brand to use it as a descriptor in every day conversation. And the subject of brand name usage might just have enough pop cultural weirdness to it.
It contains that same little cultural/corporate/consumer collision that KFC had with their secret recipe, or that Lifesavers had with sparks in the dark.
When looking for cultural ideas, the place to start is with what people are already talking about - especially if it’s your product they’re talking about. Here is a twist on that story, and Kleenex is letting it go to waste.